It was leaked that you just had an alternate with Elon Musk relating to the dangers posed by AI. [Ed note: Musk said he had told the Chinese government that AI might eventually be able to overtake it, and Raji responded by questioning the safety of today’s driverless cars, like the autopilot feature in a Tesla.] Are you able to inform me extra about that?
, it wasn’t simply Elon. That was the one which received out. There was one other CEO that was speaking about curing most cancers with AI, saying we have now to make it possible for it’s People that try this, and simply narratives like that.
However initially, we have now medical AI expertise that’s hurting folks and never working properly for Black and brown sufferers. It’s disproportionately underprioritizing them when it comes to getting a mattress at a hospital; it’s disproportionately misdiagnosing them, and misinterpreting lab exams for them.
I additionally hope that at some point AI will result in most cancers cures, however we have to perceive the constraints of the methods that we have now immediately.
What was it that you just actually wished to realize within the discussion board, and do you suppose you had the possibility to do this?
I feel all of us had substantial alternatives to say what we wanted to say. By way of whether or not we had been all equally heard or equally understood, I feel that’s one thing that I’m nonetheless processing.
My principal place coming in was to debunk lots of the myths that had been popping out of those corporations round how properly these methods are working, particularly on marginalized of us. After which additionally to debunk a few of the myths round fixing bias and equity.
Bias issues and explainability issues are simply actually troublesome technical and social challenges. I got here in being like, I don’t need folks to underestimate the problem.
So did I get that throughout? I’m undecided, as a result of the senators liked saying that AI is gonna treatment most cancers.
It’s really easy to get caught up within the advertising phrases and the sci-fi narratives and utterly ignore what’s taking place on the bottom. I’m getting back from all of this extra dedicated than ever to articulating and demonstrating the truth, as a result of it simply looks as if there’s this big hole of data between what’s truly taking place and the tales that these senators are listening to from these corporations.
What else I’m studying
- I simply liked this story from Jessica Bennett on the New York Occasions about what it’s prefer to be a teen woman with a cellular phone immediately. Bennett saved in contact with three 13-year-olds over the course of a 12 months to study in regards to the ins and outs of their digital lives. Extremely suggest!
- This social reflection on privateness by Charlie Warzel within the Atlantic has caught with me for just a few days. The story will get on the overwhelming questions we—actually I—have about what we will do to protect our privateness on-line.
- The United Nations Basic Meeting convened in New York this previous week, and one large subject of dialogue was, in fact, AI. Will Henshall at Time did a deep dive into what we’d count on from the physique on AI regulation.
What I discovered this week
A Disney director tried to make use of AI to create a soundtrack paying homage to the work of symphonist Hans Zimmer—and got here up disenchanted. Gareth Edwards, director of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, informed my colleague Melissa Heikkilä that he hoped to make use of AI to create a soundtrack for his forthcoming film about … AI, in fact! Effectively, the soundtrack fell flat, and Edwards even shared it with the well-known composer, who he says discovered it amusing.
Melissa wrote, “Edwards stated AI methods lack a basically essential ability for creating good artwork: style. They nonetheless don’t perceive what people deem good or dangerous.”
In the long run, the true Zimmer wrote the melodies for Edwards’s upcoming film, The Creator.